Elderly transgender people find a home in Jakarta
DW talks to Joshua Oppenheimer, whose film has caused a sensation at the
Berlinale. In 1965-66, some million so-called 'communists' were
massacred in Indonesia. Their killers tell the story in 'The Act of
Killing.'
DW: What is the idea behind the film?
Joshua Oppenheimer: You have a situation where the perpetrators of genocide have won and built a whole regime of terror on a mountain of corpses, a regime where they celebrate what they've done, both to reassure themselves that it's OK so that they can live with themselves and also to keep the rest of society afraid because it's scary to have mass killing celebrated and dangled before your eyes as a threat.
I came to this through a community of survivors who were too scared to tell their story - every time I tried to film we would get harassed by the police or the military, somebody would get detained, yet we thought it was very important to break the silence. They said "Josh, this is so important, go talk to the killers, they'll talk to you - they talk about this to everybody." I found that to be the case and that the killers were not giving me sober testimony in an effort to remember what they did but actually were eager to show off about what they did. I asked myself, what's going on here? Who do they think I am? How do they think I see them? How do they want me to see them? How do they want their society and the rest of the world to see them? How do they see themselves really?
The process of re-enactment did not emerge overnight. Anwar [Congo] was the 41st killer I filmed and everyone was boasting - I could have made an ensemble piece with many people, piecing together what happened with various reenactments.
But Anwar caught the attention of my filmmaking because he was honest in a way, he had a sort of stone in his shoe, his remorse - not his remorse - his trauma, his brokenness, the way he was haunted by what he did was so close to the surface that it was as if he was performing. Through this and his boasting, I felt he was trying to work something else out - he wasn't just glorifying himself, he was trying to work through some kind of pain.
I came to understand that if I just let them stage themselves, let them go all the way, I would find the answers to the above questions. So here's a film where you have seemingly unrepentant death squad leaders dramatizing their memories of genocide.
Why did you actively concentrate on the killers?
I have a lot of material about the survivors and that's going to be another film. But there was a clear decision that if we brought the survivors in as characters, the audience would immediately identify with them and see the killers as monsters; but the very thing that the film is struggling to do - which is to talk about the nature of evil and how human beings do this to each other - would falter because we would not see them as human beings. But I do think the victims haunt every frame of this film.
What do you want to happen now that you've made a film on behalf of the survivors?
The National Human Rights Commission of Indonesia published an 850-page report about what happened in August and made various demands, all of which I agree with. The report was rejected by the Attorney General.
Joshua Oppenheimer plans to make another film focusing on the survivors
Some demands are very simple - there should be a truth
commission as you cannot have reconciliation without truth and the
president should apologize on behalf of the nation. He wasn't involved
in the killings but he's an army general who has risen to his position
through an institution that was totally corrupt, totally violent and
totally disregarding of human rights and was the main actor in the
genocide - they were the ones masterminding the death squads and in some
regions they were doing the killing themselves. Of course, there should
be a process to bring the real masterminds to some kind of justice,
even in absentia as many of them are dead. I would add three other
things that need to happen.
There must be a concerted effort to get rid of corruption in Indonesia. Secondly, there needs to be an eradication of gangsterism in politics. There's no place for impunity in a democracy. Politicians have thugs working for them; big corporations have thugs working for them. The final thing that needs to happen is a radical redistribution of the nation's wealth.
The perpetrators enriched themselves and meanwhile a huge swathe of society was accused of even being related to people who were accused of being communist or leftist in some way or another - they were denied access to secondary education, they were made to do forced labor for the military, they were extorted by village officials and they were denied access to jobs. Consequently, a huge part of the population has been impoverished. Not to mention the costs associated with broken homes when husbands were taken away and killed, mothers were taken away and killed, or rape - there's poverty, there's brokenness. There needs to be an effort to rehabilitate them and pull them out of poverty. That's what I want to see.
What are your hopes of seeing this?
My hopes are that Indonesians take and show this film and use it to tell stories, break the silence and never go back and find the courage to stand up and hold their politicians accountable.
The film has caused a sea change in how Indonesia sees itself and the discussion in Indonesia. It has screened 270 times since December, in 91 cities and has provoked 500 articles, all but five of which were positive. Werner Herzog told me, "Art doesn't make a difference Josh, until it does." I'm so proud to be part of the moment where art is making a difference.
However, I can't go back to Indonesia to shoot another film. Indonesians are open and wonderful - I love Indonesia and this is in fact my love letter to Indonesia.
Interview conducted by Anne Thomas in Berlin
Joshua Oppenheimer: You have a situation where the perpetrators of genocide have won and built a whole regime of terror on a mountain of corpses, a regime where they celebrate what they've done, both to reassure themselves that it's OK so that they can live with themselves and also to keep the rest of society afraid because it's scary to have mass killing celebrated and dangled before your eyes as a threat.
I came to this through a community of survivors who were too scared to tell their story - every time I tried to film we would get harassed by the police or the military, somebody would get detained, yet we thought it was very important to break the silence. They said "Josh, this is so important, go talk to the killers, they'll talk to you - they talk about this to everybody." I found that to be the case and that the killers were not giving me sober testimony in an effort to remember what they did but actually were eager to show off about what they did. I asked myself, what's going on here? Who do they think I am? How do they think I see them? How do they want me to see them? How do they want their society and the rest of the world to see them? How do they see themselves really?
The process of re-enactment did not emerge overnight. Anwar [Congo] was the 41st killer I filmed and everyone was boasting - I could have made an ensemble piece with many people, piecing together what happened with various reenactments.
But Anwar caught the attention of my filmmaking because he was honest in a way, he had a sort of stone in his shoe, his remorse - not his remorse - his trauma, his brokenness, the way he was haunted by what he did was so close to the surface that it was as if he was performing. Through this and his boasting, I felt he was trying to work something else out - he wasn't just glorifying himself, he was trying to work through some kind of pain.
I came to understand that if I just let them stage themselves, let them go all the way, I would find the answers to the above questions. So here's a film where you have seemingly unrepentant death squad leaders dramatizing their memories of genocide.
Why did you actively concentrate on the killers?
I have a lot of material about the survivors and that's going to be another film. But there was a clear decision that if we brought the survivors in as characters, the audience would immediately identify with them and see the killers as monsters; but the very thing that the film is struggling to do - which is to talk about the nature of evil and how human beings do this to each other - would falter because we would not see them as human beings. But I do think the victims haunt every frame of this film.
What do you want to happen now that you've made a film on behalf of the survivors?
The National Human Rights Commission of Indonesia published an 850-page report about what happened in August and made various demands, all of which I agree with. The report was rejected by the Attorney General.
Joshua Oppenheimer plans to make another film focusing on the survivors
There must be a concerted effort to get rid of corruption in Indonesia. Secondly, there needs to be an eradication of gangsterism in politics. There's no place for impunity in a democracy. Politicians have thugs working for them; big corporations have thugs working for them. The final thing that needs to happen is a radical redistribution of the nation's wealth.
The perpetrators enriched themselves and meanwhile a huge swathe of society was accused of even being related to people who were accused of being communist or leftist in some way or another - they were denied access to secondary education, they were made to do forced labor for the military, they were extorted by village officials and they were denied access to jobs. Consequently, a huge part of the population has been impoverished. Not to mention the costs associated with broken homes when husbands were taken away and killed, mothers were taken away and killed, or rape - there's poverty, there's brokenness. There needs to be an effort to rehabilitate them and pull them out of poverty. That's what I want to see.
What are your hopes of seeing this?
My hopes are that Indonesians take and show this film and use it to tell stories, break the silence and never go back and find the courage to stand up and hold their politicians accountable.
The film has caused a sea change in how Indonesia sees itself and the discussion in Indonesia. It has screened 270 times since December, in 91 cities and has provoked 500 articles, all but five of which were positive. Werner Herzog told me, "Art doesn't make a difference Josh, until it does." I'm so proud to be part of the moment where art is making a difference.
However, I can't go back to Indonesia to shoot another film. Indonesians are open and wonderful - I love Indonesia and this is in fact my love letter to Indonesia.
Interview conducted by Anne Thomas in Berlin
美專家：朝鮮繼續致力於導彈發射場現代化華盛頓美國專家稱，朝鮮繼續推進國內導彈發射場現代化改造工程。霍普金斯大學朝鮮研究所“北緯38度”週五（2月15日）在其網站上通報說，衛星照片顯示，自2012年10月底以來，朝鮮東海（Tonghae）發射場的改建工程有重要進展，至2016年，該設施將能發射比去年12月升空的遠程運載火箭大3、4倍的火箭。報告稱，對一個新建的發射台所拍攝的衛星照片顯示，平壤在其導彈計劃方面得到了來自伊朗的幫助。泰國給予百萬非法移民合法身份
曼谷
泰國政府週五（2月15日）開始向最多可達100萬的緬甸非法移民發給護照、勞工許可或簽證。該國在全境設置了11個工作站點，兩國官員共同合作，確認所有尚未登記國籍的外國人的身份、發給有時限護照、工作許可及簽證。此前泰國當局曾規定，所有來自緬甸、老撾和柬埔寨的未登記移民必須在去年12月14日之前向有關當局報導。 130萬緬甸移民遵從了這一要求。但緬甸駐泰國大使館稱，還有多達100萬的緬甸移民迄今沒有登記。據此，泰國政府決定將登記期限延長至今年3月16日。
澳法院判處中國公司一前高管徒刑悉尼據法新社報導，澳大利亞一家法院週五（2月15日）判處前中國漢龍礦業（Hanlong Mining Investment）副總裁朱博施27個月監禁。該國證監會當天發表公告稱，新南威爾士州最高法院裁定現年31歲的這名被告犯有內幕交易罪。澳大利亞證監會從2011年9月起對朱博施涉嫌內幕交易展開調查，該項交易同漢龍礦業斥資13億澳元收購澳大利亞兩家礦業公司的計劃有關。澳證監會今天還表示，對其他前漢龍礦業涉案人員的調查還在進行，但拒絕發表更多評論。
習近平警告黨內記取前蘇聯教訓
儲百亮 報道 00:42
習近平在南方視察時把自己推為跟隨鄧小平步伐的大膽改革家，但私下裡，他對黨內人士稱，中國仍然必須深刻記取前蘇聯的教訓。
香港電視劇因觸及兩地矛盾遭刪減
報道 12:43
反映當下港人與內地訪客之間緊張情緒的電視劇《老表，你好嘢》在香港創下高收視率，但在內地播出時，個別敏感情節被刪去。
沒有留言:
張貼留言