2008年7月18日 星期五

affirmative action in Malaysia

Malaysian police investigating sodomy allegations against Anwar Ibrahim released the opposition leader on bail, but police warned they might detain him again and force him to give a DNA sample.

這主要還不是所謂"雞姦"問題

affirmative action, sodomy

2008年7月14日 星期一

規避網絡審查 中國網民高招迭出

wsj
拍手


規避網絡審查 網民高招迭出

英 | 大 | 中 | 小
2008年07月02日11:39
為
了避開對週末貴州省甕安縣騷亂相關報導所進行的網絡審查﹐一些博客的“博主”採取了舊式的排版方式。

週末期間﹐大約有3萬人放火焚燒政府大樓﹐抗議有關部門對甕安縣一名十幾歲女生死亡事件的處理方式。儘管國家控制的媒體立刻進行了報導﹐但負責網絡審查的人員迅速刪除了提供非官方描述的網上文章﹐封殺了這些用戶的賬戶。

Associated Press
博客作者通過各種方式繞過網絡審查報導了
甕安縣騷亂事件
因此天涯虛擬社區(Tianya.cn)等論壇的博主採取了讓互聯網的審查人員──多為商業互聯網服務提供商的雇員──難以自動檢測的方式。最近採取的一個策略是用網上的軟件將文章改為豎排版從右到左閱讀﹐與古漢語的風格相同。

中 國名為“金盾工程”(Great Firewall)的複雜審查機制能夠自動跟蹤違禁語句。但天涯社區的一位編輯稱﹐中國也有最富經驗、最有才能的網民群體﹐他們總能找到對策。他一直負責 刪除有關此次騷亂的內容。天涯社區為海南天涯在線網絡科技有限公司(Hainan Tianya Online Networking Technology Co.)所有。

距離北京奧運會開幕還有一個多月的時間﹐中國政府對網絡上下表達出來的異見已幾乎失去了耐心。6月 27日﹐南京有關部門判處孫林4年有期徒刑﹐罪名包括聚眾擾亂社會秩序等。孫林曾在海外不同政見網站博訊網(Boxun.com)上發表文章。媒體自由組 織記者無國界(Reporters Without Borders)稱﹐自2008年初以來﹐記者、網絡異見人士或言論自由維權活動者被逮捕或判刑的案件共有24起。

貴州政府部門週二開始對引發騷亂的這位17歲女學生的死亡事件進行重新調查。警方最初曾認定她是自殺﹐但憤怒的當地群眾認為她是被與當地官員有關係的人奸殺。
新華社報導稱﹐公安局官員週二為警方的行動進行了辯護﹐稱他們表現出了極大的克制。報導稱﹐在騷亂期間受傷的150人中﹐約有100名警察﹐不過大多數人受的都是輕傷。

貴州省委書記石宗源向新華社發表置評時﹐強調了社會穩定的重要性﹐這凸顯出政府在奧運會前越發焦慮的心態。新華社稱﹐這次事件被少數別有用心的人員煽動利用。

不過﹐中國的一些記者和網民卻因貴州事件而變得更加大膽。一些人用已經被證明是可靠的方法將編碼嵌入到搜索詞匯中﹐比如“Weng'an”﹐從而規避網上審查。

被稱為公民記者的周曙光(網名:Zola)一直採用各種不同的技術。在週一抵達貴州後﹐他就開始通過Twitter共享小段的信息。這種公共即時通訊工具可以在審查人員封鎖前迅速發出信息。

周曙光還把對騷亂參與者和當地居民的採訪記錄發到了他的博客上﹐而博客的服務器不在中國。他還對其網站設置了替代鏈接﹐能通過技術漏洞繞過審查機關對國內訪問其網站的封鎖。

貴 州當地報紙一位網名叫作三笑的記者稱﹐他決定在網上貼出審查機關不允許在報紙上發表的報導。週一﹐他發表了一篇名為“網絡刪貼如割草,看看傳的快還是殺的 快”的博客文章﹐其中搜集了來自不同渠道的有關騷亂的一些細節。週二前﹐他在騰訊網(qq.com)上發表的博客內容以及其它網站的大量轉貼都被刪除了。

他在電子郵件中寫道﹐將這個信息傳播出去是每一個人的責任﹐我會盡我所能。

政府最近已經顯露出一些跡象﹐將努力對中國蓬勃發展的網絡文化作出反應。根據官方統計﹐中國共有2.21億互聯網用戶。

6月20日﹐中國國家主席胡錦濤到人民日報社考察工作時﹐首次進行了網上聊天。他向官方報紙《人民日報》的員工表示﹐互聯網使人們獲取和傳播信息變得更加便捷﹐這增加了中國公眾意見的作用。

在聊天過程中﹐胡錦濤沒有使用鍵盤﹐而是通過麥克風回答了三個問題:你平時上網嗎?平時你上網都看些什麼內容?網友們提的意見和建議你能看到嗎?回答分別是:上網﹔搜集信息﹔能看到。

儘管聊天僅持續了4分鐘﹐但網民的興趣高漲。許多人都因為流量過大難以訪問該網站。之後網上的反應也大多是正面的。新浪網(Sina.com)的一個發言稱﹐我們熱淚盈眶。人民熱愛你。

Juliet Ye / Geoffrey A. Fowler

Evading China's Censors

漢 | 大 | 中 | 小
2008年07月02日11:39
To slip past Internet censors squashing reports of a weekend riot in China's Guizhou province, some bloggers have started writing backward.

Some 30,000 rioters set fire to government buildings over the weekend to protest the way authorities handled the death of a teenager in the province's Weng'an County. While state-controlled media provided immediate coverage, government censors moved fast to delete online posts providing unofficial accounts and deactivate the accounts of those users.

So bloggers on forums such as Tianya.cn have taken to posting in formats that China's Internet censors, often employees of commercial Internet service providers, have a hard time automatically detecting. One recent strategy involves online software that flips sentences to read right to left and vertically instead of horizontally, in the style of traditional Chinese.

China's sophisticated censorship regime -- known as the Great Firewall -- can automatically track objectionable phrases. But 'the country also has the most experienced and talented group of netizens who always know ways around it,' said an editor at Tianya, owned by Hainan Tianya Online Networking Technology Co., who has been responsible for deleting posts about the riot.

With the Beijing Olympics slightly more than a month away, the Chinese government has shown little patience toward dissent, online or offline. On June 27, authorities in Nanjing imposed a four-year prison sentence on Sun Lin, who had written posts on the overseas dissident Web site Boxun.com, after convicting him of 'gathering crowds to cause social unrest' and other offenses. Media-freedom group Reporters Without Borders says that since the beginning of 2008, there have been 24 cases of journalists, cyberdissidents or free-expression activists being arrested or sentenced to jail terms.

Guizhou officials on Tuesday reopened the investigation into the death of the 17-year-old student that led to the riots. Police had originally labeled her death a suicide, but outraged local residents believed she had been raped and killed by people who had connections with local officials.

Public-security officials Tuesday defended the police actions, saying they showed 'great restraint,' Xinhua reported. It said about 100 police were among the 150 injured during the rioting, but that most injuries were slight.

In comments to the state-run Xinhua news agency, provincial Communist Party chief Shi Zongyuan emphasized social stability, underscoring the government's heightened anxiety ahead of the Olympics. The incident 'was used and incited by very few people with ulterior motives' Xinhua reported.

Nonetheless, some Chinese journalists and Internet writers have been emboldened by the Guizhou incident. Some are using a tried-and-true method of burying coding inside search phrases, such as 'Weng'an,' that hide the words from online censors.

Citizen journalist Zhou Shuguang, who goes by the online name of Zola, has been using different kinds of technology. After arriving in Guizhou on Monday, he began sharing snippets of information via Twitter, a kind of public instant-messaging feed that delivers information more quickly than censors can block it.

Mr. Zhou also has posted recordings of interviews with rioters and local residents on his blog, which is hosted on a server outside China. He also hosts alternative links to his site that use technical loopholes to get around blocks placed on accessing his site inside China.

San Xiao, the online name of a reporter for a local newspaper in Guizhou, said he decided to post reports online that censors wouldn't allow in the newspaper. On Monday, he wrote a blog post titled, 'Let's see how far the post can go before it gets censored and deleted,' which collected details about the riot from several different sources. By Tuesday, his original post on the Chinese Internet destination qq.com -- plus many copies on other sites -- had been removed.

'It is everyone's responsibility to get this information out, and I will try all means,' he wrote in an email.

The government has lately shown some signs it is trying to be responsive to the country's thriving Internet culture, home to 221 million users, according to official statistics.

On June 20, Chinese President Hu Jintao participated in his first online chat, during a visit to the official People's Daily newspaper. He told the paper's staff that the Internet had made it more convenient and faster for people to obtain and spread information -- increasing the role of public opinion in China.

During his chat, Mr. Hu avoided the keyboard and spoke answers into a microphone to three questions: Do you use the Internet, what do you do on the Internet and do you read suggestions submitted online? The answers were yes, collect information, and yes.

Even though the chat lasted just four minutes, interest was high. Many found the site inaccessible because of heavy traffic. Afterward, the reactions from online were mostly positive. 'We are in tears. You are loved by the people,' said a poster on Sina.com.

Juliet Ye / Geoffrey A. Fowler

2008年7月10日 星期四

"中国和平崛起?--21世纪中国大战略"

德国外长施泰因迈尔访问中国时曾经指出,"西方不能用旧的思维模式应对新的挑战。全球经济和政治的重心正在发生着转移。因此必须重新测量世界"。毫无疑 问,在这一过程中,中国扮演着关键的角色。在德国波恩日前举行的题为"中国和平崛起?--21世纪中国大战略"研讨会上,两位权威的中国问题专家为与会者 重新测量了中国参与下的世界新格局。

中国实行着怎样的大战略?波鸿大学教授辜学武开篇明义-- 没有人知道这个问题的答案。但他认为,中国正在进行三个大试验。一是,如何在不破坏现有国际秩序稳定性的前提下,实现和平崛起的目标。二是,如何确保市场 经济体制下、私有经济不会占据主导地位。而第三点,则关乎政治体制。"一种政治制度,能否不向公众开放政治决策过程,而仅仅依靠持续的现代化、人民生活的 改善和社会的长期稳定,来保障制度的存在。过去三十年里,尽管可能导致社会动乱的因素始终存在,但中国仍旧成功维护了国家秩序和稳定。今后这种新的模式是 否能长期维持下去?"

辜学武指出,为了补偿这种模式的缺陷,中国政府采取了不同方面的措施,包括:聘请高级专家为政治决策过程把脉、实行农村基层民主、以及国家领导人任 期不超过10年的硬性规定。然而,中国是否会实现和平崛起,辜学武指出,最核心的问题在于,现有的国际秩序是否能容忍和承受中国这样一个陌生的、庞大的实 体所带来的挑战?

中国崛起与现有国际秩序之间的互动十分吸引眼球。参加讨论的另一位专家、德国科学与政治基金会瓦克尔女士列举了中国军费开支备受国际关注的例子。" 印度从俄罗斯购买最新的武器和技术,印度拥有航空母舰,而中国没有。但没有人讨论这一点。这又是一个双重标准的例子。中国的军队现代化令人恐慌,但印度就 没关系,因为印度是民主国家。"

瓦克尔女士表示,人们必须看到,90年代初中国军费开支增加的起点非常之低。与国民生产总值相比,她并不认为中国目前的军费开支过高。但是,如果要 讨论军费开支究竟多少才合适,关键的问题在于,中国必须增加透明度。"中国的军费开支不够透明,对于周边国家来说这是关键的一点。必须增进地区的互信、提 高透明度,才能避免发生不必要的冲突。"

两位专家还提及目前讨论颇多的八国集团扩张问题。辜学武认为,中国对于加入G8俱乐部其实并不感冒。"八国集团正在经历一场可信度的危机。中国认为,他们并没有义务将八国集团从危机中解救出来。这不是中国的难题。"

瓦克尔女士也表示,中国并不认同于G8组织,而是更愿意继续参与发展中国家之间的南南合作。

2008年7月8日 星期二

The G8 summit 2008

The G8 summit

A world of troubles to tackle

Jul 7th 2008 | TOYAKO
From Economist.com

The G8 leaders, meeting in Japan, have many challenges but few tools


AFP

THE leaders of the G8 group of rich countries kicked off three days of annual summitry hosted by Japan in Toyako on the northern island of Hokkaido on Monday July 7th. The remoteness of the venue—a bubble-era resort hotel overlooking Lake Toya—and an overwhelming police presence around the summit and Japan’s main cities appear to have prevented the scale of anti-globalisation protests and street violence that have disrupted recent gatherings of the world’s self-appointed steering group, including last year’s summit at Heiligendamm in Germany. But even without the protests, the leaders of Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Canada, the United States, Japan and Russia, half of them new to their job, will be aware of how much the world has changed since Heiligendamm.

At last year’s summit the price of oil was at less than half today’s $140 a barrel. The world price of rice and other grains gave few signs of doubling, threatening political stability in Africa and Asia and mocking earlier G8 commitments to reducing global poverty. Meanwhile, mention then of structured investment vehicles or Northern Rock to a G8 leader would have been met with a blank stare.

Pricey oil, the food crisis and the credit crunch: the new challenges either have their roots beyond the G8, or have quickly raced across borders. Either way, they highlight how the G8’s supposed goals work increasingly at cross-purposes. The call for lower fuel prices stands at odds with energy efficiency, cutting carbon dependence and tackling climate change—as does the drive against nuclear proliferation. Emphasising biofuels means less land for food production, leading to higher prices and hungry bellies. The desire of rich countries to avoid recession raises questions about their resolve to nip inflation. The rich-country club (plus Russia), representing a minority of the world’s population, appears ill-equipped for the challenges.

As host, Japan’s prime minister, Yasuo Fukuda, is determined to make the best of the contradictions. The summit’s opening day addresses poverty and higher food prices in Africa, with seven African national leaders invited. Japanese officials, among others, have floated the idea of a grain stockpile that might act as a buffer against volatile prices. Britain’s prime minister, Gordon Brown, proposes a doubling of food production in Africa. Ban Ki-moon, the UN secretary general, says that high food prices are "turning back the clock on development gains". But talk is cheap: non-government organisations give warning that even development goals agreed by the G8 just three years ago at Gleneagles in Scotland appear to be slipping. The head of the Asian Development Bank points out that food is not solely an African challenge: over 1 billion Asians spend some three-fifths of their income on food.

On the summit’s second day, the G8 leaders huddle informally, but on the third the “outreach” championed by Japan continues with China, India, Brazil, Mexico, Indonesia, Australia South Africa and South Korea all invited to discuss carbon emissions and global warming. That brings together the world’s biggest emitters, but few concrete decisions are likely: after all, a deal to replace the Kyoto protocol, which expires in 2012, is not due until a UN conference in Copenhagen at the end of 2009. Still, China and India might agree to make bigger verbal commitments to cutting emissions—provided the West makes money and technology available.

Until now, these two giants have argued that big cuts were an inequitable way to deal with a carbon-dioxide concentration in the atmosphere that was not of their making, but because of earlier industrialisation. Yet the United States is reluctant to adopt emissions targets without commitments from the newest industrialisers. Ahead of the summit George Bush promised to be “constructive” on climate change. If there is any sign of progress on this matter, some G8 leaders may push for something firmer than the Heiligendamm promise to “consider seriously” cutting emissions by half by 2050.

These, then, are the global challenges that the G8’s leaders will attempt to address (while also finding time to condemn Zimbabwe’s Robert Mugabe and gauge progress on North Korea’s denuclearisation). If only electorates were behind them. President Nicolas Sarkozy of France has yet to regain the popularity and authority that propelled him to office. Mr Bush, unpopular at home, is nearing the end of his term. Mr Fukuda will possibly not be around in a year’s time, with Mr Brown’s future only a little less assured. Popular restiveness against national leaders, even if it is not allowed to show itself in Toyako, puts the G8’s goals in even greater question.


温室ガス 2050年に半減、世界目標化

2008年7月9日1時45分


記 念撮影のため、サミットテラスに上がる(左から)ブッシュ米大統領、ベルルスコーニ伊首相、メルケル独首相、ブラウン英首相、福田首相、ハーパー・カナダ 首相、サルコジ仏大統領、メドベージェフ・ロシア大統領、バローゾEU欧州委員長=8日午後0時23分、北海道洞爺湖町、代表撮影 表2日目(8日)のポイント

  北海道洞爺湖サミット(主要国首脳会議)2日目の8日、主要8カ国(G8)は温室効果ガスの「2050年までの排出量半減」という長期目標について、G8 だけでなく、すべての国での共有を目指すことで一致した。こうした方針や食糧価格高騰への対応などを盛り込んだ首脳宣言を採択した。(村山祐介)

 G8は「50年半減」を新興国を巻き込んで実現する姿勢を見せ、9日には主要排出国会議(MEM)の首脳会合を中国やインドなど8カ国と開く。焦 点は新興国側の同意取り付けに移るが、中印など新興5カ国首脳は8日声明を出し、「世界の国々の平等な発展が保証されなければならない」と早くもクギをさ した。

 8日の首脳宣言では、温暖化対策で最大の焦点となった世界全体の長期目標について「2050年までに少なくとも50%の削減を達成する目標という ビジョンを、国連気候変動枠組み条約の全締約国と共有し、同条約にもとづく交渉でその目標を検討、採択を求める」と明記。この目標について「世界全体、特 にすべての主要経済国の貢献によってのみ対応できることを認識する」と強調した。枠組み条約には国連のほぼすべての加盟国が参加している。

 長期目標について「合意」の表現は宣言になかったが、外務省幹部は「G8として呼びかける以上、長期目標について見解の一致が前提となっていると思う」と述べ、事実上の合意との認識を示した。

 2020~30年ごろをめどとする中期目標についても、「排出量の絶対的削減を達成するため、野心的な中期の国別総量目標を実施する」と明記。京 都議定書に続く13年以降の国際枠組みで、「拘束される形で、すべての主要経済国が意味ある(気候変動の)緩和の行動をコミットする必要がある」とした。

 「25年までにガス排出量の伸びをゼロにする」との独自目標を掲げていた米国も、国別総量目標の設定に同意したことになり、次期枠組みの前提でG8の出方がそろった。ただ、目標の具体的な水準については言及しなかった。

 福田首相は気候変動問題の討議後、記者団に対し「50年半減」について「世界全体の目標として採用を求めるという認識で一致した。G8はこの目標が地球にとって正しく、必要な目標だと洞爺湖で確認した」と述べた。

 昨年のサミットでは日本やEUなどが提案した「50年半減」を「真剣に検討する」ことで一致。日本は洞爺湖での合意を目指してきたが、米国はG8だけの 合意には強い難色を示し、中印を含めるよう主張していた。結局、合意は明記しない形で、G8としてすべての国に目標の共有を呼びかけることでまとまった。

 一方、日本が提案した産業部門別のガス削減手法「セクター別アプローチ」については、「各国の排出削減目標を達成する上で、とりわけ有効な手法」と評 価。ガスの大幅削減を実現する革新的技術について、開発に向けた行程表を定める「国際的イニシアチブ」を立ち上げることなども盛り込まれた。

    ◇

 G8の首脳宣言について、国連の潘基文(パン・ギムン)事務総長は8日、朝日新聞記者との単独会見で「もっと強い言葉が望ましかった」と不満を示 した。一方で、「米国が2050年に半減という目標に加わったことは勇気づけられる」と一定の評価を示し、「始まりとしてはいいのではないか。問題意識は 高まった。私も明日、拡大会合の場でさらに協力を訴える」と語った。(松下佳世)




2008年7月7日 星期一

India news

Decades Later, Toxic Sludge Torments Bhopal
By SOMINI SENGUPTA
Hundreds of tons of waste languish on the grounds of the Union Carbide plant in Bhopal, India, the site of a notorious disaster that killed thousands.



06.07. - Curse of the Green Revolution Threatens Indian Farmers

In the 1960s, the “Green Revolution” in India was hailed as the golden
age of agricultural production. But increased productivity also led to
increased pressure on small farmers.

The DW-WORLD Article
http://newsletter.dw-world.de/re?l=evyt6zI44va89pI0

---------------

06.07. - Indian Newspaper Gives a Voice to Prostitutes

An estimated 15 million women work as prostitutes in India, shunned by
society. But some have found their voice with a new paper.

The DW-WORLD Article
http://newsletter.dw-world.de/re?l=evyt6zI44va89pI1


2008年7月6日 星期日

DUNHUANG, China

Art

Buddha’s Caves

Dunhuang Academy, courtesy of the Getty Conservation Institute

A hunting scene, painted in a cave at Dunhuang. More Photos >


Published: July 6, 2008

DUNHUANG, China

Skip to next paragraph

Civilization on Display

Throwing Open the Doors
Articles in this series explore how China's shifting self-image is reshaping its art and art institutions.
Sun Zhijun/Dunhuang Academy

Inside Mogaoku’s caves: A fifth-century painted Buddha, sprinkled with desert dust, shows some deterioration. More Photos »

Ru Suichu/Dunhuang Academy

Taking photographs in the caves in 1956. (In 1944 a group of Chinese scholars took control of the site.) More Photos >

The New York Times

More Photos >

SAND is implacable here in far western China. It blows and shifts and eats away at everything, erasing boundaries, scouring graves, leaving farmers in despair.

It’s one of many threats to the major tourist draw of this oasis city on the lip of the Gobi desert: the hundreds of rock-cut Buddhist grottoes that pepper a cliff face outside town. Known as Mogaoku — “peerless caves” — and filled with paradisiacal frescos and hand-molded clay sculptures of savior-gods and saints, they are, in size and historical breadth, like nothing else in the Chinese Buddhist world.

And Mogaoku is in trouble. Thrown open to visitors in recent decades, the site has been swamped by tourists in the past few years. The caves now suffer from high levels of carbon dioxide and humidity, which are severely undermining conservation efforts. The short-term solution has been to limit the number of caves that can be visited and to admit people only on timed tours, but the deterioration continues.

Plans are under way to recast the entire Dunhuang experience in a way that will both intensify and distance it. Digital technology will give visitors a kind of total immersion encounter with the caves impossible before now, but that immersion will take place 15 miles from the site.

The question of access versus preservation is a poignant one and is by no means confined to Mogaoku. It applies to many fragile monuments. What are we willing to give up to keep what we have? If you’re a Buddhist — I am not — you know that the material world is a phantom or a dream, “a flash of lightning in a summer cloud, a flickering lamp,” as the Buddha puts it in the Diamond Sutra.

As part of that world Mogaoku is a phantom too, but one that I had always wanted to see, one of my must-get-to-in-this-lifetime places. And finally I was here. With the permission of the Dunhuang Academy, the Chinese conservation and research body that oversees the caves, I stayed in quarters at the site rather than in Dunhuang itself, a city that doesn’t look like much now but certainly must have once.

Set between Mongolia and Tibet, it was a vital, cosmopolitan juncture on the Silk Road. Whether you traveled the northern branch east from Rome, or the southern one from Arabia, you ended up doing business here. And because of its gateway position, it was where Buddhism spilled out of India and Central Asia into China, leaving a residue of spectacular art.

The first cave at Mogaoku was carved in A.D. 366 by an itinerant monk named Yuezun who said that one night he saw flamelike lights pulsing across the cliff face and took them as a sign: Here you must stay. So he cut a hole in the sandstone wall and moved in.

The association of caves with religious devotion, ancient in India, caught on here. The earliest examples, small and plain, were used for shelter and meditation, occasionally for burials. From the window of my room in the academy’s guest house I could see dozens of these hollows set high up on the cliff, their low entrances black with shadows. They are hard to reach and, apart from archaeologists, few people visit them now. Probably few ever did. They were made for solitude.

Yet by the early fifth century, a cave boom was underway in the Dunhuang area, with activity concentrated at Mogaoku. Larger and larger grottoes were excavated as temples and monastic lecture halls: essentially, public spaces. Many had chapel-like niches and free-standing walk-around altars, all cut from stone. As with the Ajanta Buddhist caves in India, interiors were carved with architectural features — beams, eaves, pitched roofs, coffered ceiling — as if to simulate buildings.

Painting covered everything. Murals illustrating jatakas, tales from the Buddha’s past lives, were popular; they’re like panoramic comic-book storyboards spread across a wall. For imperially commissioned interiors, images of princeling saints and court fetes were the rule. Rock ceilings were covered with fields of decorative patterning to evoke an illusion of fabric pavilions. Any leftover space was filled with figures of tiny deities — Mogaoku was known as the Thousand Buddha Caves — painted directly on the plastered walls or stuck on as sculptural plaques.

Sculpture was where Dunhuang departed from the Indian model. In Indian caves figures were chiseled from the living rock. Everything was literally of a piece. Maybe because the sandstone at Mogaoku was too crumbly for fine work, the artists here used another method. They made figures from mud mixed with grass and molded over bundled branches and reeds.

Exceptionally large figures, in need of a solid core to keep them from collapsing, were made in a different way. The body of the 75-foot-tall Buddha in the cave known as the Nine-Story Temple is carved from the rock face and plastered over. His feet are planted at the cliff base; he looks out through a window, cut near the top.

Of the 800 or so caves created here from the 5th to 14th centuries, nearly half had some form of decoration. What survives adds up to a developmental timeline of Buddhist art in China, an encyclopedic archive of styles and ideas, of dashes forward and retreats to the past.

But of course much of it has not survived. By the 11th century Dunhuang’s fortunes were in decline. Sea trade had cut into Silk Road traffic. Regional wars left the town isolated. Monks, possibly panicked by rumors of an Islamic invasion, sealed up tens of thousands of manuscript scrolls in a small cave. The invasion didn’t happen, but the books, many of them already ancient, stayed hidden and forgotten, as Mogaoku itself was for centuries.

Nature went to work. Sand from the dunes swept into the grottoes. Rock facades gave way, leaving interiors exposed. When people finally reappeared, the damage only increased. In the late 19th century a wandering Taoist priest named Wang Yuanlu settled down and started a ruinous program of “conservation,” discovering the bricked-up library cave with its precious scrolls in the process. He didn’t know it, but he had made of one of the most important archaeological finds of modern times.

Other people soon knew. In 1907 the British explorer Aurel Stein arrived. For a pittance he bought around 5,000 silk and paper scrolls from Wang and sent them to England. Some were paintings and banners; the bulk were religious and secular books in Chinese, Sanskrit, Tibetan, Mongolian and other regional languages, evidence of the capacious ethnic melting pot that China has always been.

Of all Stein’s books the prize was a ninth-century woodblock copy of the Diamond Sutra, or the “Sutra of the Perfection of Wisdom of the Diamond that Cuts Through Illusion.” As if defying the scripture’s insistence on transience as the only reality, this marvelous scroll is the earliest known dated example of a printed book, six centuries older than the Gutenberg Bible.

After Stein came the French linguist and Sinologist Paul Pelliot. In one marathon reading session he eyeballed the entire remaining contents of the library cave, sorted out the cream and packed it off to Paris. Then a Japanese expedition arrived to claim a share, followed by a Russian one. In the 1920s the swashbuckling American art historian Langdon Warner sliced 26 murals from Mogaoku cave walls and gave them to Harvard, along with a pilfered sculpture. (You can still see the ghost-outlines of figures where he lifted off the thin plaster sheets.)

Whatever else can be said of them, these men fully understood the value of what they saw at Mogaoku. “There was nothing to do but gasp,” Warner wrote of his first glimpse of decorated caves. This is still a natural reaction. It was my reaction. Accompanied by a Dunhuang Academy researcher and guide, Liu Qin, I visited two dozen caves in a single day, and afterward couldn’t shake what I’d seen.

First there is darkness, intensified because of the blazing desert sun. When your eyes adjust to the dusky light filtering in, you see that you’re being observed by other eyes, those of a larger-than-life fifth century Northern Wei Buddha. He has a large broad head, soft limbs and a moony smile. Dressed in a hot-weather Indian dhoti, he looks like a giant toddler lost in a world of his own.

Further inside, the only illumination is Mr. Liu’s flashlight. Visions come and go. A small sculptured Buddha backed by a jade-green halo meditates in a niche. A standing divinity wreathed by a garland of maiden angels wears a flower-spattered robe of Persian brocade. Calligraphic figures, blue against white, tumble across the wall like swallows in a wind. Feathered, but with human faces, riding dragon-drawn chariots, they might be immortals from Chinese mythology, though in the flickering light it is hard to tell.

Then they are gone, replaced by court musicians with banjos and flutes. Soon these are gone too. Then a drama in several scenes about bandits being blinded for their crimes and rejoicing as the Buddha restores their sight. Gone. A corps of heavenly dancers, a hundred Maya Plisetskayas in saris. The flashlight sweeps a ceiling thick with colored patterns; they seem to stream toward a central lotus medallion like filings to a magnet. The total effect is riotous, hallucinatory, of another realm. No wonder Warner took chunks of it home.

China, engulfed in a long period of political disunity and chaos, couldn’t prevent the plundering. Finally in 1944 the Dunhuang Research Institute, formed by a band of young Chinese scholars, took control of the site. Now called the Dunhuang Academy, it is still here, stabilizing the caves structurally, conserving their sculptures and paintings and monitoring visitor access.

Mogaoku is charmed ground. In late spring and early summer the air is fragrant, the sky a lambent blue, the desert oceanically serene. And there is the art and the soaked-in atmosphere of devotion. The place leaves strong and alluring memories in the memories of visitors; in its caretakers it inspires lifelong loyalty.

The current director of the Dunhuang Academy, Fan Jinshi, arrived as a graduate student in 1963. At that time getting here was an ordeal; there were no planes, few trains. The academy’s headquarters had neither electricity nor running water. She married, but her husband worked elsewhere. Sometimes they didn’t see each other for months at a time, once for a full year. In 1998, after 35 years on the job, she was named director of the academy. At 70, she is still here, working as hard as ever.

During her time much has changed. The site has been brought technologically up to date. A once-bare-bones staff has grown to around 300 full-time conservators, researchers, groundskeepers and guards, supplemented since the late 1980s by training teams from the Getty Conservation Institute in Los Angeles, led by Neville Agnew. The ever-encroaching tide of sand has been slowed by a system of wind-breaking nets.

Transportation to Dunhuang has become relatively easy. A new train station has just gone up; the airport runway, once made of tar that was said to turn soft in the sun, has been reinforced. Yet from a plane window the town still has a marooned, precarious look, like a lone atoll at sea.

In 1980 the caves, or some of them, were opened to the public, although only a trickle of visitors came, most of them Japanese tourists in search of the roots of their own Buddhist tradition. Recently this pattern has radically changed. With a flourishing economy, a relaxation of the Cultural Revolution’s disapproval of religion and the central government’s strenuous promotion of a new nationalist pride, hundreds of thousands of tourists, 90 percent of them Chinese, are coming to Mogaoku each year, jamming into the caves.

The impact has been significant. The risk of direct contact with art is somewhat reduced by the installation of transparent screens, but the physical degradation caused by fluctuating atmospheric conditions — humid to dry to humid again — is acute. Although no one is saying so, it is possible that without major change, all the caves will eventually have to be closed to the public.

Plans for drastic remedial action are in place. Under Dr. Fan and the vice director, Wang Xudong, the academy will build by 2011 a new visitor reception center several miles from the caves, near the airport and railroad station. All Mogaoku-bound travelers will be required to go to the center first, where they will be given an immersive introduction to the caves’ history, digital tours of interiors and simulated restorations on film of damaged images. They will then be shuttled to the site itself, where they will take in the ambience of its desert-edge locale and see the insides of one or two caves before returning to where they started.

(About 70 percent of the money for the visitor center — the equivalent of $38 million — is coming from the Chinese government. The rest must be raised from private sources. Details related to the project can be found on friendsofdunhuang.org.)

For Chinese visitors a partly virtual approach may not feel unusual. Many museums in China give equal time to art objects and information technology. Multimedia evocations of sites are common: it is the only way to see excavated tomb frescos too sensitive to light and air to be removed from the underground. And it is common practice substitute copies of famous works of art in museums when the originals are unavailable.

For Westerners addicted to the concept of authenticity, to the romance of “the real thing,” the idea of a primarily digital experience of Mogaoku is hard, if not impossible to accept. Art is, after all, about the aura attached to uniqueness. The art experience depends on being there.

Paradoxically this insistence on authenticity is also the impulse driving contemporary conservation. At whatever cost, the integrity of the original must be preserved. Yet conservators know that often the only way to protect the “real thing” is by restricting access to it, by forcing an audience to accept a condition of not being there, by substituting virtual auras for actual ones. And so the contradictions pile up, and change inexorably goes on.

At dawn on the morning I am leaving Mogaoku, it is quiet. I watch the sun hit the hard-to-reach caves high up on the cliff. Then I watch buses of Chinese tourists arrive from hotels in town, coming early, before the heat of day. Several are teenagers or a little older, plugged into iPods, taking photos with cellphones, in an antic mood. Together they troop across the barrier bridge that leads to the caves. They’re wearing hard-soled shoes. They laugh, some inside joke. They do not mind making noise.

Exactly what they are looking for at Mogaoku, or will find, is hard to know; they seem so distracted, so somewhere else. Yet just before reaching the cave they stop and linger, as do other, older visitors, over a small text-and-photo display. It documents Wang Yuanlu’s presence here a century ago and describes the visits of Stein, Pelliot and Warner and what they took away. Maybe this is what Mogaoku means to its new audience: not art, not faith but cultural heritage with a loaded political history.

As for me, I’m heading to the airport. I consider making a quick return to the Nine-Story Temple before I leave, but head in the opposite direction, toward the desert. From afar I had noticed a scattering of small stupa towers and hutlike shrines just beyond Mogaoku’s boundaries. Mr. Liu said they were memorials to monks and priests who had died at Mogaoku, Wang Yuanlu being one. There were lots of markers once, but most have been worn down.

They are made from the same stuff as almost all of the cave sculptures, air-dried earth mixed with grass. Outdoors it cracks and breaks easily; chips from the memorials litter the ground. Two of the shrine huts have crude little frescos in shelflike niches, with sand silted up in the corners. I brush some away.

Well, I think to myself, you made it here, someplace you always wanted to go. Is it what you hoped it would be? Yes, exactly as I’d hoped. Will you return? Life is busy; time is a problem; the distance is great. Besides, if I did return, it wouldn’t be the same. It would change, wouldn’t it?

On some impulse I look back at the cliff, toward the face of the great stone Buddha behind his window, but I can’t see his eyes.

2008年7月3日 星期四

亞洲亂事l不满

亞洲亂事

社会不满情绪导致蒙古暴乱

蒙古国发生数十年以来最严重的暴力骚乱,造成5人死亡、数百人受伤之后,今天(本周四)首都乌兰巴托的形势暂时平静下来。上周日,蒙古举行议会大选,初步 统计显示执政党人民革命党赢得胜利。反对党民主党拒绝接受这一结果,称选举存在舞弊现象。周二的骚乱发生后,蒙古总统宣布实行紧急状态令。下面是德广联记 者从发自北京给德国之声发来的报道。

网络视频平台Youtube上可以看到蒙古骚乱的画面。在首都乌兰巴托,年轻的示威者突破警察的封锁,高举拳头冲进执政党总部大楼。为控制局面,总统宣布实行紧急状态令。

正在乌兰巴托的德国蒙古问题专家雷娜特-伯曼介绍说,目前的形势已经平静下来,"这里非常平静。媒体总是夸大事实。这里的生活已经恢复正常。只不 过,如果人们外出,必须携带身份证件。此外,晚上10点到早晨8点之间在市中心实行宵禁。军队是在巡逻,但他们十分闲适的坐着军车,冲锋枪放在腿上,还抽 着烟。"

雷娜特-伯曼已经在蒙古生活了8年。位于俄罗斯和中国之间的蒙古人口仅有260万。蒙古官方解释说,导致骚乱发生的原因是周末议会选举的结果。蒙古民众选举产生新一届议会,失败的一方指责胜利者选举舞弊。

雷娜特-伯曼则认为,之后发生的骚乱是有预谋的行动,"我亲身经历了骚乱。当时我站在执政党总部大楼门前,看到抗议者的表情充满了仇恨。他们中许多 人并不是为了民主或者政治或者选举舞弊才来到这里,他们就是想制造暴动。我还从多种渠道听说,他们中很多人是被政治力量收买的,因为这股政治力量看到自己 进入议会的希望破灭了。"

目前蒙古官方正式公布了选举的初步统计结果,并将在部分选区重新计票。对大多数蒙古人来说,生活在一个民主、热爱和平的国家令他们感到骄傲。因此,周二的暴力骚乱使许多人十分震惊。

蒙古问题专家雷娜特-伯曼表示,发生骚乱的真正原因在于社会不满情绪。尽管蒙古有丰富的原材料和矿产资源,但超过三分之一的民众挣扎在生存线上," 对许多蒙古人来说,他们的生活不但没有好转,反而更加恶化。因此他们感到十分不满。对于议会的工作表现,他们也非常不满意。因为从政的人并不关心解决实际 问题,而是如何填满自己的腰包。这种不满情绪逐渐积累,而突然爆发,就不足为奇了。"

德国之声版权所有

转载或引用请标明出处和作者

责任编辑:德国之声中文网



中国 | 2008.07.03

刘晓波谈“无利益相关者事件”

►中国贵州瓮安发生万人冲击政府机关的严重事件之后,很多人都发出了这样的疑问。为什么一起围绕刑事案件而产生的纠纷会引发如此规模的骚乱,为什么那么多与事件当事人或者死者毫无关系的人会参与其中?围绕瓮安事件所产生的种种疑问,德国之声记者采访了北京学者刘晓波。

6月28日发生的瓮安事件起因是当地一名初中女生死亡之后,家属和警方对死因有不同看法,从而产生矛盾。但随后却导致了万人上街,围攻机关 的暴力事件,值得注意的是,参与所谓"打砸烧"行动的民众中,死者家属及亲友应该是极少数。因为按照中国官方媒体的报道,起初只是有300多名死者亲友上 街游行,要求查明真相。而最后的万人骚乱则显然已经超越了一般"亲友喊冤"的性质。

北京学者刘晓波把这种现象定义为"无利益相关者事件",也就是说这些事件的参与者中绝大部分既不是直接受害者,也与受害人没有亲属关系和利益瓜葛, 他们之所以卷入事件,并不是官方所谓"少数人煽动"的结果,而是民间不满长期积累的结果,"中国现行体制造成了一种地方吏治的极度劣质化,这种官民之间的 紧张关系可能就会因为一点小的事情就点燃了。"

刘晓波还把瓮安事件与2004年发生的重庆万州事件作了一番比较,两起事件起因都是简单的民事或者刑事个案,而最后却都引起了大规模的骚乱,两者都 可以归类为"无利益相关者事件"。而在重庆万州事件发生之后,也有部分官员和学者指出,作为三峡水利工程移民区的万州在社会经济问题上矛盾重重,这是引发 群体性事件的重要原因之一。

在瓮安事件发生之后,尽管官方将其定性为"被少数别有用心的人员煽动利用,公然向党委、政府挑衅的群体性事件",但贵州省委书记石宗源也承认,瓮安事件显示当地一些社会矛盾长期积累,多种纠纷相互交织,没有得到重视,没有及时解决,干群关系紧张。

其实矛盾积累,干群关系紧张正需要通过信息透明,上下沟通加以解决。但瓮安事件中,先是地方政府极力阻止死者家属上访,此后又通过官方媒体封锁消 息,统一口径。然而,在互联网日益发达的情况下,简单的信息封锁已经完全无法达到效果。事件发生后不久,相关的图片和影像资料已经出现在互联网上,其中甚 至包括死者家属的申诉状以及法医验尸报告。

刘晓波指出,在网络民意的舆论滔滔之下,官方舆论应对显然难以招架,"在网络时代官方最大的一个盲区在于,一旦出现这种事情,他就想把消息来源垄 断,只由新华社发。但是封锁其它媒体,只有贵州省单方面提供的消息,网民不可能相信。因为你没有独立的新闻渠道,你不让国内外记者亲临现场进行调查,没有 中立的第三方。很多网民就质疑这一点,当地政府作为被告的对象不能出来发布消息。"

一方面是各种信息通过网络在社会中以平行的方式迅速传播,另一方面,垂直方向的信息传播方式极其狭窄低效,以"信访制度"为主的上情下达渠道无法起 到作用,导致真假难分的消息在民间沸沸扬扬,而上层却无法有效的了解民意,最终致使矛盾积累到一定程度后,引发大规模事件。这也是瓮安事件留给人们的一个 重要思考。

德国之声版权所有

转载或引用请标明出处和作者

石涛